Showing posts with label society. Show all posts
Showing posts with label society. Show all posts

Monday, July 27, 2009

HUGE PENALITY

0 comments
Woman Fined $2 Million for Downloading 24 Songs

A federal jury found a 32-year-old Minnesota woman guilty of illegally downloading music from the Internet and fined her $80,000 each -- a total of $1.9 million -- for 24 songs.

Illegal downloads of musical files will cost a Minnesota woman $1.9 million, a jury has decided.

Jammie Thomas-Rasset's case was the first such copyright infringement case to go to trial in the United States, her attorney said.

Throughout the trials, Thomas-Rassett has always pledged her innocence, but juries have been incredulous. In fact, as part of her testimony in this trial, Thomas-Rassett suggested -- for the first time -- that her children or ex-husband might have been the downloading culprits. If the jurors didn't buy into the defendant's attempt at implicating her children, we couldn't imagine it helped to bolster her image in their eyes.

Attorney Joe Sibley said that his client was shocked at the fine, noting that the price tag on the songs she downloaded was 99 cents.

She plans to appeal, he said.

Cara Duckworth, a spokeswoman for the recording industry asscociation of America , said the association was "pleased that the jury agreed with the evidence and found the defendant liable."

"We appreciate the jury's service and that they take this as seriously as we do," she said.

Thomas-Rasset downloaded work by artists such as No Doubt, Linkin Park, Gloria Estefan and Sheryl Crow.


This was the second trial for Thomas-Rasset. The judge ordered a retrial in 2007 after there was an error in the wording of jury instructions.

The fines jumped considerably from the first trial, which granted just $220,000 to the recording companies.

Thomas-Rasset is married with four children and works for an Indian tribe in minnesota.

Wednesday, July 8, 2009

MICHAEL JACKSON'S OBITUARY

0 comments


JACKSON'S
OBITUARY SWAMPED AND SPIKED TRAFFIC OVER NET










:








Did your Internet connection seem slow Thursday afternoon? It wasn’t problem of ur computer, it was the surge of interest in Michael Jackson’s hospitalization ,treatment and death
.

When news of the iconic performer's death began trickling out, scores of people turned to the Web for information. when a channel broke the news that Jackson, 50, known for producing some of the world's best selling records, including "Thriller" and "Bad," had died Thursday afternoon, but the gossip hub cited only unnamed sources and offered few details. As other news services turned their attention to the story and as the public took to the Web to learn more about the performer's condition, some Web sites began slowing down.
As news of Michael Jackson’s death began to spread last Thursday, the crush of people flocking to the Web for information overloaded several Web sites and services, causing AOL’s instant messaging service, news sites, Twitter and Wikipedia to buckle under the strain.

But just how much traffic are we talking about? Compete, a Web analytics firm based in Boston, crunched some numbers and came up with a few data points to help illustrate the surge.It found that there were 9.98 million queries for the terms “Michael” and “Jackson” across the top 25 search engines and news and social media sites in the week ended June 27. Compete said that was more than 24 times the number of queries for information using the terms “Iran” and “election” during the week before. Google, which said that its systems initially interpreted the spike in searches as an attack, fielded the most requests, handling 61 percent of the queries. Yahoo Music pulled in a hefty 45 percent of Web surfers seeking the pop maestro’s albums, music videos and merchandise, according to Compete. YouTube ranked a distant second with 23 percent. Compete said Yahoo’s dominance was probably a result of spillover from its coverage of Mr. Jackson’s hospitalization. Yahoo said its coverage broke traffic records, generating 800,000 clicks in the first 10 minutes that the story was posted. The increase in interest in Mr. Jackson’s legacy has been reflected in record-shattering sales of music, both online and at retail stores.

Akamai said that traffic to news Web sites spiked around 6 p.m. Eastern, clocking in at one point at 4.2 million visitors per minute. During the rest of the day, the sites tracked by Akamai never exceeded 3 million visitors per minute. Some entertainment news Web sites including EOnline.com and PerezHilton.com appeared to load more slowly than normal. Sometimes they did not load at all, according to the observations of several reporters early Thursday evening. Even Google had trouble keeping up. Between 5:40 p.m. and 6:15 p.m. Eastern, after TMZ.com had said Mr. Jackson had died, some visitors to Google News “experienced difficulty accessing search results for queries related to Michael Jackson,” a Google spokesman said.

Reminiscence @ MICHAEL AT THE AGE OF 5 - 1970

onethanx@aol.com
onethanx@aol.com
onethanx@aol.com

Friday, June 12, 2009

нσω ℓσηg would уσυ ѕαу тнαт вυℓв ωσυℓ∂ ℓαѕт ?؟

0 comments

нσω ℓσηg would уσυ ѕαу тнαт вυℓв ωσυℓ∂ ℓαѕт ?؟


Left, two low-energy consumption bulbs and a traditional light bulb. (Credit:Reuters)


Talking about how long an LED lamp will last, that certainly seems to be the state of the question.? ?


Manufacturers of LED lamps, which many regard as the next generation of lighting, destined to eventually replace today’s incandescent and compact fluorescent lighting sources, make wild claims as to product life.

Typical incandescent bulbs last 1,000 to 2,000 hours. But in speaking about LED replacements, lamp life is routinely quoted as 25,000 to 50,000 hours. Long lamp life, and the reduced power used to create the same amount of light, is what makes this technology so promising.

But what does a 25,000-hour life mean? As it turns out, no one is quite sure yet. The definitions surrounding LED lamps, a nascent technology, are still being made up as we go along.

One thing we do know: It means something different than when people think about the life of a regular light bulb.

When it’s said that a standard light bulb will last 1,000 hours, that is the mean time to failure: half the bulbs will fail by that point. And because lamp manufacturing has become so routine, most of the rest will fail within 100 hours or so of that point.

But LED lamps don’t “burn out.” Rather, like old generals, they just fade away.

When a manufacturer says that an LED lamp will last 25,000 or 50,000 hours, what the company actually means is that at that point, the light emanating from that product will be at 70 percent the level it was when new.

Why 70 percent? Turns out, it’s fairly arbitrary. Lighting industry engineers believe that at that point, most people can sense that the brightness isn’t what it was when the product was new. So they decided to make that the standard.

Of course, brightness is subject to the old frog in the boiling water syndrome. I’m sure that most people won’t even notice the lower level then, if they’ve lived with the same bulb for its entire life. (How many owners of rear projection DLP TVs only realize that a TV’s image has dimmed once they replace the bulb?)

If nothing else in the lamp fails, like its electronics, the product will continue to work until it becomes really dim. But some engineers are proposing a way to get around even that.

Their idea is that once the LEDs start to emit less light, increase the power to each one to increase its brightness. Unfortunately, that will also diminish the life of the lamp.

Good idea, or bad? “The utilities really don’t like this idea,” Fred Welsh, a Department of Energy consultant, told me on Thursday at a lighting conference sponsored by his federal agency.

Not only would contractors need to use thicker cables, but the utilities would need to create more power, partially negating the appeal of LED lighting in the first place.

But still, it’s in its early days, and no one yet knows how this will be settled, or how the consumer will be educated to think about “bulb life” in a different way than they have for the past 130 years. If consumers are going to switch to this new lighting technology, it’s an issue that needs to be settled.

And if it isn’t? “This is a potential black eye for the industry,” Mr. Welsh said.

SOURCE: Newyork times

onethanx@aol.com

Sunday, May 17, 2009

WOMEN DETECTS AROMA WELL ? ? ?

0 comments


WOMEN DETECTS AROMA WELL
THAN MEN ..? ? ?

YES says reports :

Research at the Monell Chemical Senses Center finds that women have keener senses of smell than do men, and that men's body odors are harder to cover up than are women's.




Body odor reveals more than when we last showered - it also packs important biological information. And apparently women are better at catching the scent of body odor than men, a new study found.A woman friend of mine recently commented about her guy: “He’s such a boy. His towels are stinky. And he doesn’t seem to notice!” Well, maybe he can’t smell the stinkyness. According to recent research from the Monell Chemical Senses Center, women have much sharper noses.

Scientists collected microdroplets of perspiration, and had men and women sniff the vials. According to both, the odors were equally rich. Subjects were then asked to rate odor strength when sniffing the sweat mixed one by one with 32 different fragrances. Only two of the fragrances stopped women from smelling the sweat. But 19 fragrances successfully blocked it from male noses.

Body odor is special—the authors note that in previous studies men’s and women’s scent detection did not differ when it came to other aromas. The researchers also concluded that men’s odor is harder to mask than women’s, regardless of who sniffs. Only a fifth of the fragrances could cover up male odor. But half of the scents masked female odor. The researchers suggest that for women there may be important biological information contained in male sweat. So maybe don’t wash those towels just yet.

onethanx@aol.com

Tuesday, April 21, 2009

SIGNIFIERS

0 comments

An abbreviation (from Latin brevis, meaning "short") is a shortened form of a word or Phrase Usually, but not always, it consists of a letter or group of letters taken from the word or phrase. For example, the word abbreviation can itself be represented by the abbreviation abbr. or abbrev.

Today I provide some of the coolest Abbrev. so see and Enjoy ! ! ! !

  • BMW- bayerische motoren werke
  • FIAT - fabrica italiana automobili torino
  • IBM - international Business machines corporation
  • KFC - kentucky fried chicken
  • INTEL - integrated Electronics
  • BIBLE - Best Information before Leaving Earth
  • AOL - american Online inc.
  • GOOGLE Giving Opinions & Options Generously Linked Everywhere
  • BIBLE - Best Information before Leaving Earth
  • LG - Combination of two popular Korean brands Lucky and Goldstar


onethanx@aol.com

Wednesday, March 18, 2009

Marriages

0 comments

20 Tooooooo-Costly Marriages

According to Forbes , who threw the 20 most expensive celebrity weddings in history? From Nicole and Keith to Liza and David, celebrities sure know how to host the most expensive and elaborate weddings.

20. Nicole Kidman and Keith Urban

Photo: Gareth Cattermole/Getty Images

Wedding Date: June 25, 2006

Total Cost: $250,000

Location: Cardinal Ceretti Chapel in Manly, Australia

Gown: Balenciaga = $20,000

Limousine: Rolls Royce = $5,000

Party Favors: Tiffany Clocks = $80,500

Star Guests: Russell Crowe, Naomi Watts and Hugh Jackman.

19. Marc Anthony and Dayanara Torres

Photo: Andre Kang/Getty Images

Wedding Date: December 7, 2002

Total Cost: $250,000

Location: Cuartel de Ballaja in Puerto Rico

Gown: Reem Acra = $30,000

Divorced in 2004

18. Tommy Mottola and Mariah Carey

Photo: Evan Agostini/Getty Images

Wedding Date: June 5, 1993

Total Cost: $500,000

Location: Saint Thomas Church in NYC

Gown: Vera Wang = $25,000

Shoes: Vanessa Noel = $1,000

Star Guests: Dick Clark, Ozzy Osbourne, Billy Joel, and Barbra Streisand.

Divorced in 1998

17. Ashley Judd and Dario Franchitti

Photo: Vince Bucci/Getty Images

Wedding Date: August 4, 2001

Total Cost: $750,000

Location: Skibo Castle in Ireland

Gown: Armani = $70,000

Champagne: $72,000

Accommodations: $175,000

Star Guests: Salma Hayek, Ed Norton, Wynonna Judd, and Naomi Judd.

16. Victoria Adams and David Beckham

Photo: Andrew H. Walker/Getty Images

Wedding Date: July 4, 1999

Total Cost: $800,000

Location: Luttrells Castle in Ireland

Gown: Vera Wang = $100,000

Jewelry: $160,000

Accommodations: $100,000

Star Guests: Geri Halliwell, Melanie Chisholm, Melanie Brown, and Sir Bobby Charlton.

15. Brad Pitt and Jennifer Aniston

Photo: Evan Agostini/Getty Images

Wedding Date: July 29, 2000

Total Cost: $1 million

Location: Carsey Estate in Malibu, California

Gown: Lawrence Steele = $50,000

Tuxedo: Yves Saint Laurent = $4,000

Lobster and Champagne: $300,000

Security Guards: $100,000

Star Guests: Cameron Diaz, Salma Hayek, Melissa Etheridge, and Courteney Cox.

Divorced in 2006

14. Tori Spelling and Charlie Shanian

Photo: Frazer Harrison/Getty Images

Wedding Date: July 3, 2004

Total Cost: $1 million

Location: Spelling Estate in Bel Air, California

Gown: Badgley Mischka = $50,000

Flowers: $100,000

Star Guests: Bob Newhart, Jason Priestley, Ian Ziering, and Tiffani Thiessen.

Divorced in 2006

13. Donald Trump and Melania Knauss

Photo: ANdrew H. Walker/Getty Images

Wedding Date: January 22, 2005

Total Cost: $1 million

Location: Mar-a-Lago Estate in Palm Beach, Florida

Gown: Christian Dior = $125,000

Caviar: $18,000

Flowers: $500,000

Star Guests: Regis Philbin, Kelly Ripa, Katie Couric, Hillary Clinton, Matt Lauer, Rudy Giuliani, Star Jones, Simon Cowell, and Barbara Walters.

12. Madonna and Guy Ritchie

Photo: George Pimentel/Getty Images

Wedding Date: December 22, 2000

Total Cost: $1.5 million

Location: Skibo Castle in Scotland

Gown: Stella McCartney = $80,000

Fireworks: $200,000

Food and Champagne: $800,000

Security: $70,000

Star Guests: Trudie Styler and Sting, Stella McCartney, Gwyneth Paltrow, and Rupert Everett.

Divorced in 200

11. Pierce Brosnan and Keely Shaye Smith

Photo: Stephen Shugerman/Getty Images

Wedding Date: August 4, 2001

Total Cost: $1.5 million

Location: Ballintubber Abbey in Ireland

Gown: Two Richard Taylor designs = $60,000

Tuxedo: $12,000

Flowers: $70,000

10. Eddie Murphy and Nicole Mitchell

Photo: Evan Agostini/Getty Images

Wedding Date: March 18, 1993

Total Cost: $1.5 million

Location: The Plaza Hotel in NYC

Gown: Silk Satin = $40,000

Cake: $25,000

Security: $2,000 per hour

Star Guests: Donald Trump, Marla Maples, Heavy D, David Alan Grier, Charles Dutton, and Sheryl Lee Ralph.

Divorced in 2006

9. Tiger Woods and Elin Nordegren

Photo: Andrew Redington/Getty Images

Wedding Date: October 5, 2004

Total Cost: $1.5 million

Location: Sandy Lane Beach Resort in Barbados

Food: Caviar and Scottish salmon

Fireworks: $50,000

Accommodations: $200,000

Star Guests: Michael Jordan, Charles Barkley, Oprah Winfrey, and Bill Gates.

8. Michael Douglas and Catherine Zeta-Jones

Photo: Bruce Glikas/Getty Images

Wedding Date: November 18, 2000

Total Cost: $1.5 million

Location: The Plaza Hotel in NYC

Gown: Christian Lacroix = $140,000

Favors: Godiva Chocolates = $100,000

Jewelry: Fred Leighton = $300,000

Star Guests: Goldie Hawn, Oliver Stone, Jack Nicholson, Meg Ryan, and Martha Stewart.

7. Elton John and David Furnish

Photo: F. M. Brown/Getty Images

Wedding Date: December 22, 2005

Total Cost: $1.5 million

Location: The Windsor Guildhall in England

Tuxedos: Two at $5,000 each = $10,000

Jewelry: Chopard Diamonds= $240,000

Champagne: $120,000

Caviar: $10,000

Star Guests: Ringo Starr, Victoria Beckham, Liz Hurley, Cilla Black and Lulu.

6. Christina Aguilera and Jordan Bratman

Photo: Peter Kramer/Getty Images

Wedding Date: November 19, 2005

Total Cost: $2 million

Location: Staglin Vineyard in Napa, California

Gown: Christian Lacroix = $30,000

Tuxedo: $5,000

Jewelry: Diamond Rosary = $10,000

Hotel Suite: $3,500 per night

Star Guests: Justin Timberlake, Carmen Electra, Drew Barrymore, Cameron Diaz, and Pink.

5. Liz Taylor and Larry Fortensky

Photo: Frazer Harrison/Getty Images

Wedding Date: October 6, 1991

Total Cost: $2 million

Location: Michael Jackson's Neverland Ranch in California

Gown: Valentino = $30,000

Food and Wine: $500,000

Star Guests: Eddie Murphy, Liza Minnelli, Brooke Shields, Nancy Reagan, and Quincy Jones.

Divorced in 1996

4. Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes

Photo: Handout/Getty Images

Wedding Date: November 18, 2006

Total Cost: $2 million

Location: Odescalchi Castle in Lake Bracciano, Italy

Gown: Armani = $45,000

Tuxedo: Armani = $3,000

Wine/Champagne: $180,000

Accommodations: $750,000

Star Guests: Will and Jada Smith, Brooke Shields and Chris Henchy, and Jennifer Lopez and Marc Anthony.

3. Liza Minnelli and David Gest

Photo: Kevin Winter/Getty Images

Wedding Date: March 16, 2002

Total Cost: $3.5 million

Location: Regent Wall Street Hotel in NYC

Event Staff: $150,000

Gown: Two Bob Mackie designs = $45,000

Flowers: $700,000

Cake: $40,000

Star Guests: Mia Farrow, Chaka Khan, Diana Ross, Luther Vandross, and Lauren Bacall.

Divorced in 2007

2. Elizabeth Hurley and Arun Nayar

Photo: Pascal Le Segretain/Getty Images

Wedding Dates: March 2, 2007 - March 9, 2007

Total Cost: $2.5 million

Locations: Sudeley Castle in England and Jodhpur, India

Gowns: Liz was rumored to have worn 13 different dresses

Private Jets: $300,000

Jewelry: Custom by Chopard = $250,000

Hotel Rooms: $300,000

Star Guests: Elton John, Kate Moss, Donatella Versace, and Elle Macpherson.

1. Sir Paul McCartney and Heather Mills

Photo: Ralph Orlowski/Getty Images

Wedding Date: June 11, 2002

Total Cost: $3 million

Location: The Castle Leslie in Ireland

Gown: Eavis & Brown = $40,000

Flowers: $145,000

Fireworks: $150,000

Cake: $4,500

Star Guests: Ringo Star, Sir Elton John, David Gilmour, Steve Buscemi, and Eric Clapton.

Divorced in 2008


onethanx@aol.com

LIVE ACTIVITY

Followers

Locations of visitors to this page

Copyright 2008 All Rights Reserved Revolution Two Church theme by Brian Gardner Converted into Blogger Template by Bloganol dot com